HomeNewsCommentariesDisplay

Body Fat and PT test performance

Airmen run on a track.

Participants, hosts and spectators in the Fastest Athletes on Base Track Meet gather at the finish line at Kirtland Air Force Base, N.M., July 18, 2019. The athletes, had the opportunity to run the 100, 200 and 400 meter sprints during the event. (U.S. Air Force photo by Staff Sgt. Kimberly Nagle)

Airmen run on a track.

Participants in the Fastest Athletes on Base Track Meet compete in a race at Kirtland Air Force Base, N.M., July 18, 2019. The fastest participants from the event will be selected to attend the Battle of the Bases for New Mexico, competing in several categories to include an obstacle course relay, one mile relay and a 100 yard sprint. (U.S. Air Force photo by Staff Sgt. Kimberly Nagle)

Airmen run on a track.

Participants in the Fastest Athletes on Base Track Meet sprint to the finish line at Kirtland Air Force Base, N.M., July 18, 2019. The runners were competing for a spot on the team going to the Battle of the Bases for New Mexico, competing against Holloman AFB and Cannon AFB. (U.S. Air Force photo by Staff Sgt. Kimberly Nagle)

Airmen run on a track.

Participants in the Fastest Athletes on Base Track Meet begin their first heat at Kirtland Air Force Base, N.M., July 18, 2019. The runners had the option to run the 100, 200 and 400 meter sprints. (U.S. Air Force photo by Staff Sgt. Kimberly Nagle)

Airmen run on a track.

Participants in the Fastest Athletes on Base Track Meet are briefed on the rules and safety procedures before the meet at Kirtland Air Force Base, N.M., July 18, 2019. The track meet was hosted to help find participants in the first ever Battle of the Bases for New Mexico competition. (U.S. Air Force photo by Staff Sgt. Kimberly Nagle)

KIRTLAND AIR FORCE BASE, NM. --

With the Air Force physical fitness assessment on hold until October 2020, and the abdominal circumference (AC) component delayed until 2021, there may be a temptation for some Airmen to exercise less and eat more, assuming they can still pass. That’s not a good idea as 99.7% of Airmen who fail the AC test also fail at least one other component (run, push-ups, sit-ups). This indicates that excess body fat is the overwhelming contributor to PT test failure, regardless of the component. 

Too much body fat is dead weight and it slows Airmen down on the run test and makes push-ups/sit-ups more difficult. I and colleagues of mine recently posted online research on this subject as part of a virtual strength and conditioning conference. Our research focused on the effect of fat mass and fat free mass on 1.5 mile run times. 

For fat free mass (FFM), which is everything but fat, we found no significant relationship between FFM and run times. For fat mass (FM) and run times, however, there was a significant relationship; higher body fat (FM) = slower run times. 

For example, an Airman with an average body weight of 176 lbs and 26% body fat would result in a run time of 12:20. By contrast, an Airman with a weight of 154 lbs and 15.5% body fat would record a run time of 11:11, over one minute faster. 

The effect of body fat was so strong that we were able to estimate how much slower an Airman would run based on how much excess body fat they had. For every extra 2.2 pounds of body fat, the run time would be 5.5 seconds slower. Therefore, 11 pounds of body fat would slow run times by 27.5 seconds, and 2 pounds of body fat would slow run times by 55 seconds; almost a minute. 

This ‘fat drag’ effect on run times can be substantial. I recently conducted a Bod Pod test on an Airman, and calculated that if he reduced his body fat to 20%, (which is the upper limit for healthy body fat in males) his run time would improve by 75 seconds! 

Let’s take two hypothetical Airmen. Both Airmen have the same amount of FFM. Airman A has 20 pounds more body fat than Airman B. Airman B, however, is wearing a ruck which weighs 20 pounds.

If both Airmen run 1.5 miles, the 20 pound ruck will degrade Airman B’s run time TO THE SECOND the exact same amount as the 20 pounds of body fat degrades the run time of  Airman A; there’s no difference at all.

A similar effect has been observed with push-ups. When you perform a push-up, the primary resistance is gravity, which is the same for everyone. How much added mass you have to move against a constant resistance matters. Excess body fat for a push-up test is like wearing a ruck, except that every Airman’s ‘ruck’ is a different weight, depending on how much body fat they have. 

In fact, research has shown that if everyone who took a run test or push-up test wore a 30 pound ruck, the added mass would result in a test in which the outcome is independent of body size. That 30 pounds will be a larger percent increase in weight for smaller Airmen relative to bigger Airmen, so it cancels out the advantage that a smaller Airman would normally have. 

The take-home message is that spending time in the weight room gaining muscle won’t slow down your run time (it may actually improve run times) but excess body fat WILL slow down your run times, and make push-ups/sit-ups more difficult. For information on how to reduce your ‘fat drag,’ contact the Health Promotion Flight at 846-1186.

USAF Comments Policy
If you wish to comment, use the text box below. AF reserves the right to modify this policy at any time.

This is a moderated forum. That means all comments will be reviewed before posting. In addition, we expect that participants will treat each other, as well as our agency and our employees, with respect. We will not post comments that contain abusive or vulgar language, spam, hate speech, personal attacks, violate EEO policy, are offensive to other or similar content. We will not post comments that are spam, are clearly "off topic", promote services or products, infringe copyright protected material, or contain any links that don't contribute to the discussion. Comments that make unsupported accusations will also not be posted. The AF and the AF alone will make a determination as to which comments will be posted. Any references to commercial entities, products, services, or other non-governmental organizations or individuals that remain on the site are provided solely for the information of individuals using this page. These references are not intended to reflect the opinion of the AF, DoD, the United States, or its officers or employees concerning the significance, priority, or importance to be given the referenced entity, product, service, or organization. Such references are not an official or personal endorsement of any product, person, or service, and may not be quoted or reproduced for the purpose of stating or implying AF endorsement or approval of any product, person, or service.

Any comments that report criminal activity including: suicidal behaviour or sexual assault will be reported to appropriate authorities including OSI. This forum is not:

  • This forum is not to be used to report criminal activity. If you have information for law enforcement, please contact OSI or your local police agency.
  • Do not submit unsolicited proposals, or other business ideas or inquiries to this forum. This site is not to be used for contracting or commercial business.
  • This forum may not be used for the submission of any claim, demand, informal or formal complaint, or any other form of legal and/or administrative notice or process, or for the exhaustion of any legal and/or administrative remedy.

AF does not guarantee or warrant that any information posted by individuals on this forum is correct, and disclaims any liability for any loss or damage resulting from reliance on any such information. AF may not be able to verify, does not warrant or guarantee, and assumes no liability for anything posted on this website by any other person. AF does not endorse, support or otherwise promote any private or commercial entity or the information, products or services contained on those websites that may be reached through links on our website.

Members of the media are asked to send questions to the public affairs through their normal channels and to refrain from submitting questions here as comments. Reporter questions will not be posted. We recognize that the Web is a 24/7 medium, and your comments are welcome at any time. However, given the need to manage federal resources, moderating and posting of comments will occur during regular business hours Monday through Friday. Comments submitted after hours or on weekends will be read and posted as early as possible; in most cases, this means the next business day.

For the benefit of robust discussion, we ask that comments remain "on-topic." This means that comments will be posted only as it relates to the topic that is being discussed within the blog post. The views expressed on the site by non-federal commentators do not necessarily reflect the official views of the AF or the Federal Government.

To protect your own privacy and the privacy of others, please do not include personally identifiable information, such as name, Social Security number, DoD ID number, OSI Case number, phone numbers or email addresses in the body of your comment. If you do voluntarily include personally identifiable information in your comment, such as your name, that comment may or may not be posted on the page. If your comment is posted, your name will not be redacted or removed. In no circumstances will comments be posted that contain Social Security numbers, DoD ID numbers, OSI case numbers, addresses, email address or phone numbers. The default for the posting of comments is "anonymous", but if you opt not to, any information, including your login name, may be displayed on our site.

Thank you for taking the time to read this comment policy. We encourage your participation in our discussion and look forward to an active exchange of ideas.